Saturday 23 March 2019

Difficult Questions to Ask for Improving Breast Cancer Detection


Early detection of breast cancer is critical to survival. One in eight women will have breast cancer in their lifetime, with an early stage (American Cancer Society) survival rate of 99 percent for five years. Given these figures and the known limitations of the current detection of breast cancer,
it is imperative to ask the difficult questions surrounding the detection of breast cancer. Improved early detection translates into saved lives, less extreme surgical procedures and lower costs.

The following questions must be asked for better detection of the condition:

How to classify the breast abnormality?
The classification system for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Services (BI-RADS) was created to help healthcare providers categorize breast abnormalities based on their likelihood of malignancy (scale 0–6), but each category covers a wide range. An additional BI-RADS system is also used to categorize the percentage of dense breast tissue that appears in the breasts of a woman (A-D scale); patients are reported in over half of the country density.

Is it breast cancer or benign?
Anomalies in the breast may be suspicious or questionable, but they are ultimately benign. This can lead to uncertainty in patients receiving false positive test results. All diagnoses have known ambiguity, which contributes to false positive outcomes. When an initial finding is identified as breast cancer and later determined to be benign, a false positive occurs.

Is the possibility of cancer overlooked?
Breast tissue consists of both glandular and fatty tissue. Increased glandular tissuecontributes to increased density of the breast, which may obscure some cancers. On breast imaging, glandular tissue appears white, similar to cancer, making early detection more challenging. Legislation in more than half of the country mandates women is informed of their breast density level, although the results are reported differently in most states and are not necessarily met with adequate tools for cancer detection.

No comments:

Post a Comment